Strict Standards: Declaration of SubmissionKeywordEntryDAO::getByControlledVocabId() should be compatible with ControlledVocabEntryDAO::getByControlledVocabId($controlledVocabId, $rangeInfo = NULL, $filter = NULL) in /home/revistas/public_html/lib/pkp/classes/submission/SubmissionKeywordEntryDAO.inc.php on line 20
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/revistas/public_html/lib/pkp/classes/submission/SubmissionKeywordEntryDAO.inc.php:20) in /home/revistas/public_html/lib/pkp/classes/template/PKPTemplateManager.inc.php on line 836
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/revistas/public_html/lib/pkp/classes/submission/SubmissionKeywordEntryDAO.inc.php:20) in /home/revistas/public_html/lib/pkp/classes/template/PKPTemplateManager.inc.php on line 837
Computational assessment of the progressive collapse of reinforced concrete planar frames using a nonlinear multilayered beam formulation
| IBRACON Structures and Materials Journal
Computational assessment of the progressive collapse of reinforced concrete planar frames using a nonlinear multilayered beam formulation
Cláudio Ernani Martins Oliveira
Everton André Pimentel Batelo
Péter Zóltan Berke
Ricardo Azoubel da Mota Silveira
Thierry Jacques Massart
Resumen
This work investigates the response of two reinforced concrete (RC) planar frames after the loss of a column and their potential resistance for progressive collapse (PC). Nonlinear dynamic analysis is performed using a multilayered Euler/Bernoulli beam element, including elasto-viscoplastic effects. The material nonlinearity is represented using one-dimensional constitutive laws in the material layers, while geometrical nonlinearities are incorporated within a corotational beam formulation. The frame models were designed in accordance with the minimum requirements proposed by fib [1-2], Eurocode 2 [3], and NBR 6118 [4]. The load combinations considered for PC analysis follow the prescriptions of DoD [5]. The work aims at verifying if the minimum requirements of the considered building codes are sufficient for enforcing structural safety and robustness, and also points out the major differences in terms of PC potential of the corresponding designed structures.